Uber How taxi hailing firm used its secret Greyball tool to deceive law enforcement worldwide

Greyball was part of a program called VTOS which Uber created to root out people it thought were using or targeting its service improperly.

  • Published:
How Uber used its secret Greyball tool to deceive law enforcement worldwide play

An UberX car on the streets of New York, July 16, 2015. Uber has for years engaged in a worldwide program to deceive authorities in markets where its ride-hailing service was being resisted by law enforcement, or in some instances, had been outright banned, the New York Times reported on March 3, 2017.

(Mark Kauzlarich/The New York Times)
24/7 Live - Subscribe to the Pulse Newsletter!

Uber has for years engaged in a worldwide program to deceive authorities in markets where its low-cost ride-hailing service was being by law enforcement or, in some instances, had been banned.

The program, involving a tool called Greyball, uses data collected from the Uber app and other techniques to identify and circumvent officials who were trying to clamp down on the ride-hailing service. Uber used these methods to evade the authorities in cities like Boston, Paris and Las Vegas, and in countries like Australia, China and South Korea.

Greyball was part of a program called VTOS, short for “violation of terms of service,” which Uber created to root out people it thought were using or targeting its service improperly. The program, including Greyball, began as early as 2014 and remains in use, predominantly outside the United States. Greyball was approved by Uber’s legal team.

Greyball and the broader VTOS program were described to The New York Times by four current and former Uber employees, who also provided documents. The four spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Uber’s use of Greyball was recorded on video in late 2014, when Erich England, a code enforcement inspector in Portland, Oregon, tried to hail an Uber car downtown in a sting operation against the company.

At the time, Uber had just started its ride-hailing service in Portland without seeking permission from the city, which later declared the service illegal. To build a case against the company, officers like England posed as riders, opening the Uber app to hail a car and watching as miniature vehicles on the screen made their way toward the potential fares.

But some of the digital cars they saw in the app did not represent actual vehicles. And the Uber drivers they were able to hail also quickly canceled. That was because Uber had tagged England and his colleagues — essentially Greyballing them as city officials. The company then served up a fake version of the app populated with ghost cars, to evade capture.

In a statement, Uber said, “This program denies ride requests to users who are violating our terms of service — whether that’s people aiming to physically harm drivers, competitors looking to disrupt our operations, or opponents who collude with officials on secret ‘stings’ meant to entrap drivers.”

Top 3

1 Fintech In 2016, you paid banks N138 billion for SMS alerts, other feesbullet
2 Uber EXCLUSIVE: Drivers will get a "top up" every week to ease fare...bullet
3 Fintech We don't care about "digital banking" as much as we think we dobullet

Pulse Tech