ADVERTISEMENT

Court fixes date for ruling of AMCON’s takeover

AMCON had earlier announced that it intends to take over Arik Air Ltd to “save it from collapse."

An Arik Air plane

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports  that AMCON had on Feb. 8 announced that it had taken over Arik Air Ltd to “save it from collapse and in the best interest of the general public, workers, creditors and others in the aviation sector.

A legal practitioner, Mr Oluseye Opasanya (SAN), was appointed as the receiver manager of Arik Air following its takeover by AMCON.

By an ex parte application on Feb. 8, AMCON secured an injunction restraining Arik’s shareholders, directors, creditors, managers, officers, employees, servants, and privies, from interfering with Opasanya’s power to manage the airline.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, four persons — Sir Joseph Arumemi-Ikhide, Chris Ndule, Dr. Michael Arumemi-Ikhide and Engr. Sangowawa Olubiyi — had filed a preliminary objection against the court’s order.

Their preliminary objection was filed through their lawyer, Mr Babajide Koku (SAN).

They accused the lawyer representing AMCON and Opasanya, Prof. Kayinsola Ajayi (SAN), of engaging in “professional misconduct” and urged the court to void all the processes so far filed on behalf of AMCON and Opasanya.

The grounds of their objection was that Ajayi and Opasanya are both lawyers practising in the law firm of Olaniwun Ajayi LP.

Koku argued that by virtue of Rule 17 of Professional Conduct of Legal Practitioners 2007, neither Ajayi nor any other lawyer from the law firm of Olaniwun Ajayi LP could appear in a case where Opasanya is a plaintiff.Opposing the preliminary objection, Ajayi argued that there was a distinction between Opasanya and the law firm of Olaniwun Ajayi where Opasanya works, adding that no law stops anyone from representing Opasanya.Besides, Ajayi also filed a preliminary objection challenging the locus standi of the plaintiffs to file the preliminary objection.

ADVERTISEMENT

He argued that they were not parties in the suit in question which AMCON and Opasanya filed against Arik and the Inspector-General of Police, describing them as interlopers, who should not be heard.

He, therefore, urged the court to dismiss their preliminary objection.

After hearing both preliminary objections on Friday, Justice Mohammed Idris, adjourned until May 15 for ruling.

JOIN OUR PULSE COMMUNITY!

Unblock notifications in browser settings.
ADVERTISEMENT

Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or:

Email: eyewitness@pulse.ng

Recommended articles

EFCC withdraws appeal against Yahaya Bello

EFCC withdraws appeal against Yahaya Bello

Gov Zulum wants Army to establish military base in Sambisa forest

Gov Zulum wants Army to establish military base in Sambisa forest

2 Wike loyalists exit Fubara's cabinet as Governor reshuffles

2 Wike loyalists exit Fubara's cabinet as Governor reshuffles

Ganduje believes APC is the answer to Nigeria’s problems

Ganduje believes APC is the answer to Nigeria’s problems

Spate of deaths strikes Nigerian movie industry, Nigerians calls for action

Spate of deaths strikes Nigerian movie industry, Nigerians calls for action

Gov Sanwo-Olu to unveil Lagos Transport Policy in May to attract investors

Gov Sanwo-Olu to unveil Lagos Transport Policy in May to attract investors

Palliatives not for your friends only - Sanwo-Olu warns LG against hoarding

Palliatives not for your friends only - Sanwo-Olu warns LG against hoarding

Doctors warn snakebite victims not to bring snakes to hospital for identification

Doctors warn snakebite victims not to bring snakes to hospital for identification

NCDMB: My failure to inflate budget by ₦30bn cost me my job - Wabote

NCDMB: My failure to inflate budget by ₦30bn cost me my job - Wabote

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT