ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

The FCC just took the next step in reversing Obama’s 'open internet' rules

The FCC has fired the starting gun in its plan to dismantle the net-neutrality rules set during the Obama administration.

FCC chair Ajit Pai.

The Federal Communication Commission on Thursday voted to initiate the process of undoing the net-neutrality rules put in place during the Obama administration.

The vote fell 2-1 along party lines, with Republicans Ajit Pai, the chairman, and Michael O'Rielly voting in favor of Pai's proposal to reverse the rules. Democrat Mignon Clyburn voted against.

The vote does not mean the existing net-neutrality rules are dead. Instead, the FCC will now seek further public comment before finalizing an order that would undo the rules in earnest. That order will require another vote, most likely later this year.

Even if the commission passes that order, that wouldn't necessarily end the matter. The new rules will almost certainly be challenged in court by proponents of the Obama-era rules.

ADVERTISEMENT

That could be an extended process. It took about 10 months for the current net-neutrality rules to go from proposal to official policy, then another 15 months to be upheld in court.

But the vote Thursday has fired the starting gun.

Today's net-neutrality rules classify internet service providers like Comcast and Verizon as utility-like "common carriers" under Title II of the Communications Act. That classification gave the FCC broad authority to dictate what ISPs could do within their networks.

Pai's proposal aims to strip that Title II classification for ISPs and reverse them back to being Title I "information service providers." That is what they were considered before the current rules. Pai says the expanded FCC authority — including a "general conduct" rule that lets the FCC strike down future abuses that aren't explicitly covered by the official rules — has depressed ISPs' willingness to invest in their networks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pai's proposal expresses support for the "no blocking" rule but seeks comment on whether any of the core net-neutrality rules are necessary. Republicans and various ISPs feel it's best to punish any abuses after the fact, instead of preemptively eliminating the possibility of misconduct with what they see as heavy-handed regulation.

Clyburn, for one, decried Pai's proposal as a "hollow theory of trickle-down economics" at the FCC's public meeting on Thursday.

Major ISPs like Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T have said they will not block or throttle content should the rules be reversed. The FCC twice tried to impose net-neutrality rules using Title I authority before the current rules were enacted in 2015, and it was defeated in court by ISP lawsuits on both occasions.

Pai has said he would welcome congressional action that would turn net-neutrality principles into law, though it's not clear what such a bill would look like with the ongoing gridlock in Washington.

More than 2.1 million public comments have already been filed since Pai issued his notice of proposed rulemaking — many spurred by comedian John Oliver's call to preserve the rules — though hundreds of thousands of those comments appear to have been generated by bots, bringing their authenticity into question.

ADVERTISEMENT

Expect things to intensify on both the internet and Capitol Hill from here.

JOIN OUR PULSE COMMUNITY!

Unblock notifications in browser settings.
ADVERTISEMENT

Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or:

Email: eyewitness@pulse.ng

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT